Search This Blog

Friday 27 December 2013

Following Theroux & rediscovering Bratby

Romney Marsh drainage channels

I
do not know why, but I have never been particularly drawn to travel writing, and the only books I’ve read that qualify are John Hillaby’s Journey Through Britain, and S. P. B. Mais’ The Land of the Cinque Ports. I did once start Paul Theroux’s The Great Railway Bazaar. However, in his description of the journey between Victoria and Folkestone, I was somewhat startled by this sentence:  
The black train yards of Ashford loomed and tumbled past, and we were crossing the hummocky grass of Romney Marsh, headed towards Folkestone.
Well, there is what might be described as hummocky grass on Romney Marsh. However, the railway between Ashford and Folkestone not only does not cross Romney Marsh, but neither is a single glimpse of it afforded from the train! To the south–west of the railway the land rises gradually for some two to three miles until it reaches the degraded sea cliffs which stretch from Hythe to Ham Street. These cliffs are on average 95 feet high, and at their base are the rich alluvial levels of Romney Marsh proper. Only from a helicopter hovering some 100 feet above the railway it would it be possible to see the spread of the Marsh out towards Dungeness and Rye. “Does this matter?” you may well ask, “Was not Theroux only being impressionistic and using his imagination?” Perhaps, but after reading something so demonstrably false, I felt that I could have no confidence in his description of places I had never seen. Further, it seems from Theroux’s sentence as if it is “the ‘black train yards of Ashford” that are looming and tumbling past us; and if either the train or “the black train yards” were tumbling past it’s hard to imagine anything short of disastrous consequences.  
There is a similarly misleading sentence in Theroux’s The Kingdom by the Sea: A Journey Around The Coasts of Great Britain. In the chapter entitled “The Branch Line to Hastings”, Theroux takes the train from Rye to Hastings. The stops between are Winchelsea, Doleham, Three Oaks, and   Ore. Here is the impressionistic sentence:
At Three Oaks and farther on at Ore there were pink flowers, and more sheep browsing in the meadows, and ivy growing so thickly on the oaks it seemed to upholster them.
I like the idea of the oaks seeming to be upholstered by the ivy. However, pink flowers and sheep may be seen anywhere along the line from Rye to Three Oaks; but as to sheep, I have never – over a period of sixty years – seen a single one on the steep, overgrown slopes around Ore Station (which otherwise sits in the middle of a built–up area).
I am not sure that Theroux is not more interested in people, their ideas and habits, and what they have built and discarded in land– and city–scapes, than he is in natural history (what, for example, were those ‘pink flowers’ called?). So it is that he seems impatient to get from one place to another. However, I am finding The Kingdom by the Sea very readable. Here is one of his encounters at a hotel in Littlestone (part of the ‘ribbon–blight’ of bungalows that stretch from Hythe to Dungeness – and indeed despoil the coast from Camber to Portsmouth, except where the Cliffs of the Hastings Beds and the South Downs prevent development).
The lady from the front desk, Mrs Turgis, showed me to my room and hesitated and then sat on my bed and said,       
“You’ll want this switched off,” and moved her slender figure against a toggle on the wall. 
“The intercom,” she explained, “When it is on we can hear everything that happens.”  
“Me talking to myself,” I said.       
“Or you might have a young lady in here,” Mrs Turgis said.   
“Is that likely?” I said.    
“And then you wouldn’t want anyone to hear,” she said, and smiled.     
She was sitting on my pillow.
~ _________________________________________________ ~
From Littlestone, Theroux makes his way via Dungeness and Lydd to Camber on the far western edge of the Marsh (just within the county of East Sussex). Camber sands are a delight, but on the landward side of the dunes is a mess of bungalows and holiday camps, and at the western end of the sands Theroux finds
...peeling, collapsing huts and rusting caravans and weeds and even a dump full of twisted metal and yesterday’s plastic... [A] disfigurement... reminiscent of a Third World country.
This is good, and true enough of the blight south of Rye, and had Theroux been able to walk on the western side of the Rother he might well have come across an abandoned works, where the ground reeked of oil and was littered with rusting machine parts and empty oil drums. All a far cry from the cosy tea rooms of Rye... And Rye Harbour village is a dispiriting mess of houses and bungalows, built everywhere and anywhere, without shape or plan. It is not hard to see why no one who lives there seems to smile. But Theroux does not take to Rye. He finds it is “not a restful place . . . It urges you to remark on the pretty houses and the well–kept gardens and the self–conscious sign painting and then it urges you to move on.” Well, this is perhaps the problem with passing through a place instead of spending time there. I have visited Rye probably in excess of one hundred times, and every year my wife and I spend a few days there. True, a lady once jocularly remarked to us at a bus stop that in Rye they were, “All pickled in aspic and gin and jaguars.” That is certainly true of some, and yet there is a bohemian side to the town, and a degree of eccentricity that has nothing to do with class. And it is one of those places where you can speak to almost anyone, and that makes me feel at home. Then too, it is placed between the sea, the Marsh, and the Weald of Kent and Sussex.
It is a pity that Theroux did not walk the footpaths between Rye and Hastings: the topography is as varied as anyone could wish for. However, once in (Old) Hastings, Theroux finds a rich variety of people to talk to.  He starts by visiting the artist, John Bratby, in his house, The Cupola, perched at the top of a road on the East Hill. Asked why he had come to live in Hastings, Bratby replied, “Because it is one of the three cheapest places to live in England . . . I could never buy a house this large in London . . . I’d have a poky flat if I didn’t live in Hastings.” Theroux tells us that Bratby “sometimes referred to his famous riotous past – so riotous that it nearly killed him.”

John Bratby. Christmas Eve, Christmas Day, and Boxing Day. 1959
Probably very few people remember or know about so–called kitchen sink painting;  but if they do, then Bratby  will probably be the only  name that readily comes to mind. Kitchen sink painting took as its motif anything about the house that would not normally be considered a suitable subject for a painting. Typically, it was the kitchen table rather than the sink that was painted: particularly the breakfast table cluttered with cereal packets and sauce bottles (with the brand names clearly drawn), and milk bottles, dirty plates, etc. Peter Coker was another leading practitioner of kitchen sink art, and I do not know if his Table and Chair is not a finer painting than any that Bratby did during this period. (Peter Coker’s Table and ChairThere is anyway something very satisfying about these thickly impasted paintings in which the earth colours have undoubtedly been used to great effect.  I had thought that Bratby had run out of ideas, and was doing little more than repeat himself, but it seems that I was wrong, and that he remained vigorous as a painter (judging from Google Images). Bratby died of a heart attack in 1992. He was on his way home with a packet of fish and chips. This seemed a very ‘Bratby–like’ end – and I think he would have thought so too.
_________________________
The index on Blogger does not work, so I'm creating an index to the blogs according to title, theme, subject. This can be found on my website:

No comments: